Hubert Humphrey and the Moral Test of Government

ImageIn politics, location is as important as it is in real estate. Hubert Humphrey was one of the great political and moral leaders of his generation. Unfortunately, he was located too closely to politicians who had more charisma and more power than he, but less vision.

No candidate for president in 1960 has a better record on civil and human rights than Hubert Humphrey, but he couldn’t match the magnetism or pocketbook of John F. Kennedy. In 1968, his presidential campaign was overshadowed by his closeness to Lyndon Johnson and Vietnam. Richard Nixon eked out a narrow victory that year, though skeptics believe that was because Nixon deviously convinced North Vietnam to ignore LBJ’s peace overtures until after the election.

Looking back, one suspects it was tragic that Hubert Humphrey was never President of the United States. His philosophy of government was not always embraced by actual Oval Office occupants:

“It was once said that the moral test of government is how that government treats those who are in the dawn of life, the children; those who are in the twilight of life, the elderly; and those who are in the shadows of life, the sick, the needy and the handicapped.”

If that sounds like ordinary political rhetoric, the difference is that Humphrey meant it. He was a profile in courage from the beginning of his career. When he was Mayor of Minneapolis in 1948, he pushed his fellow Democrats to strengthen their commitment to labor, welfare, and civil rights. He burst upon the national scene in 1948 with a firey address to the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia, calling for a stronger civil rights plank:

I do not believe that there can be any compromise of the guarantees of civil rights which I have mentioned. In spite of my desire for unanimous agreement on the platform there are some matters which I think must be stated without qualification. There can be no hedging – no watering down. There are those who say to you – we are rushing this issue of civil rights. I say we are 172 years late.

The speech helped precipitate the walk-out of southern delegates, who formed the Dixiecrat Party and rallied behind Strom Thurman’s presidential candidacy. The party split seemed to doom President Truman’s chances for re-election.

Humphrey’s speech may have annoyed Truman, who did win the 1948 election, but it propelled him into the U.S. Senate. His progressive record commanded national attention and in 1960 he ran unsuccessfully for president in primaries that were dominated by John Kennedy.

ImageHumphrey continued in the Senate during the Kennedy years and I wrote to him on several occasions, usually eliciting a thoughtful response from him.

In 1964, Humphrey spearheaded support for Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Both Humphrey and the president realized the bill would not be supported by southern Democrats. LBJ recruited Republican leader Everett Dirksen to bring moderate Republicans into the fold, and Humphrey played a pivotal role in bringing the bill to the president’s desk for signing.

LBJ rewarded Humphrey by naming him vice president inn the 1964 election. For the most part, Humphrey was treated badly by Johnson — who, as a former vice president himself, should have known better. But Humphrey was a loyal supporter of the president and his Great Society.

Humphrey’s loyalty included support for Johnson’s Vietnam policy. There is a sad footnote to his vice presidency in which Humphrey was invited to address the general assembly of the National Council of Churches, a long-time progressive ally. He may have been expecting a friendly reception, but the faith leaders lambasted the administration’s “immoral war.”

Humphrey was re-elected to the senate after his difficult turn as vice president and he continued to serve with distinction. After the election of 1976, when Jimmy Carter defeated Gerald Ford, Humphrey paid a friendly visit to the outgoing president.

“I only wish I had had more time,” Ford told him.

“Aw, Mr. President, don’t complain,” Humphrey said. “I would have given anything for a day in this office.”

Looking back, I have no doubt this country would have been much better off if Hubert Humphrey had indeed been our president, if only for a day.

About Philip E Jenks

Philip is a retired communicator for American Baptist Churches USA, the U.S. Conference for the World Council of Churches, the U.S. National Council of Churches, and two Philadelphia area daily newspapers. He and his spouse, the Rev. Martha M. Cruz, live in Port Chester, N.Y.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s